Saunterings:  Walking in North-West England
Saunterings is a set of reflections based upon walks around the counties of Cumbria, Lancashire and
North Yorkshire in North-West England
(as defined in the Preamble).
Here is a list of all Saunterings so far.
If you'd like to give a comment, correction or update (all are very welcome) or to
be notified by email when a new item is posted - please send an email to email@example.com.
This is one of several relatively short items about local walks during the first
coronavirus lockdown, April - May 2020.
89.  Tracking the Thirlmere Aqueduct
The Waterworks Bridge
We walked to the Waterworks Bridge – again. An obvious question is: What is the
bridge for?  The bridge itself gives us a clue by saying “Manchester
Corporation Water Works 1892” on its side. In fact, it carries the aqueduct
from Thirlmere to Manchester. This aqueduct, 153 kilometres long, is the longest
gravity-fed aqueduct in Britain, supplying up to 227 million litres (or 50 million gallons)
a day, with water flowing at a stately 6 kilometres an hour. That’s slow enough for
the Manchester dignitary who turned the tap at Thirlmere in 1894 to be able
to get to Albert Square, Manchester in time to turn the tap there to welcome
the new water. If I were that dignitary, I’d want to do the same.
A less obvious question is: Why is the aqueduct on a bridge over the Lune and not in a tunnel?  The aqueduct is
obviously underground as it approaches the bridge down the slope to the north and also as it leaves the bridge across fields to the south. I’ll offer an answer later but you might like to mull over the question while we follow the route of the aqueduct across our region.
The aqueduct is not downhill all the way. It is, for example, higher on
the flanks of Clougha (about 150 metres) than
it is at the Waterworks Bridge (about 20 metres). The aqueduct therefore functions as a syphon, as explained in this rather good
which features the Waterworks Bridge from 4.20. For most of its length
the aqueduct is a concrete pipe within a channel over 2 metres deep and 2 metres wide,
with about 1 metre of cover above the pipe. Some of the aqueduct requires a
tunnel, for example, for 5 kilometres through Dunmail Raise. It was, of course,
technically possible to tunnel under the Lune, in which case we’d hardly be aware that the aqueduct was here.
Left: On Waterworks Bridge, looking towards Clougha.
There are clearly four pipes within the Waterworks Bridge. According to one
website about the Thirlmere Aqueduct,
“where the aqueduct route had to cross river valleys multiple pipelines were used”, which rather implies that
the water in the underground pipe was split into four to get across the Lune – but I’ll express some doubts
about that in a minute. The average fall of the aqueduct is 20 inches per mile. At the Waterworks Bridge,
however, the pipes can be seen descending at a steep angle. This is, in fact, the steepest drop, and hence
the point of greatest hydrostatic pressure (410 feet), for the whole aqueduct, with a displacing force at
the angles of 54 tons. The anchoring arrangements here, then, have to be very efficient.
From the valve house on the south bank, the aqueduct heads due south for over 1 kilometre
before curving slightly east. We walked on the line of the aqueduct to meet a gate in a fence. It looks like an ordinary gate but it has a distinctive style, with narrow metal bars plus diagonal and an undulating top. From the gate we can see (with binoculars) two similar gates in the hedges ahead. These gates were added not so much to function as gates but to enable engineers to follow the line of the aqueduct. They enable us to do the same today.
Right: The gate in the field near to the aqueduct.
We returned to the old railway line to meet up with the line of the aqueduct near Ellers Farm. Here the aqueduct passed
under the railway line by means of a bridge, now overgrown. It continues under an otherwise inexplicable gap through
the new houses. Two of our distinctive gates can be seen by the A683, with another two across the fields (one open
when we looked). We walked south by Artle Beck (through houses as the footpath is still closed) and then east on
Brookhouse Road, where there is a gate to be seen on both sides of the road.
In the field by Artle Beck north of Brookhouse Road there are four square objects.
These are air valves for the aqueduct. At every summit along the pipeline, and on long level stretches, a valve
must be placed to allow the escape of air. Accumulations of air in the pipe would cause an enormous diminution
in the quantity of water delivered. But why are there four of them if the four pipes across the Lune are
consolidated into one pipe underground, as suggested above?
Left: The valves in the field by Artle Beck - note the gap
through the new houses.
After 1892, because Manchester and other cities of the north-west were increasingly thirsty, three further pipes
were laid, presumably adjacent to the first one, between 1904 and 1927. No doubt, there’s one valve
per pipe. As can be seen, one of the valves is a little apart from the other three. My guess is that the three further pipes were laid together in a wider channel than the first one. They may not have been all turned on at once but laid in anticipation of future need.
But what about the Waterworks Bridge – and especially the tunnels?  Were they
designed from the beginning to carry four pipes?  I can see no evidence that the Waterworks Bridge was later widened, so I think it must have been.
Right: The valves and gate to the north from Stauvins Farm with a distant view of the
valve house on the north bank
of the Lune.
We walked through the Hawthorn Close ginnel to reach the footpath to Forge Mill, finding another gate in the hedge to
the right, with a further gate in the hedge to the north, with more valves, one of them quite far apart from the
others. From Forge Mill we took the footpath east to cross the aqueduct again, just west of Stauvins Farm. We know
what to look for now – we saw three more gates (making fourteen in all) and two more sets of valves, one by the
fence to the north and the other near the Artle Dale wood (making four in all).
We said goodbye to the aqueduct here as it continued across Artle Beck, heading for Intack House, Birk Bank, and so on. We thus felt satisfied that we had tracked the path of probably the largest engineering works carried out within the region.
So why was the aqueduct taken over the Lune and not under it?  It could, of course, be a simple matter of cost.
However, I notice that to the south the aqueduct goes under Artle Beck (where a bridge would be seen by
nobody) but has a flamboyant bridge over Ottergear Clough (which is on a footpath).
The Waterworks Bridge is clearly not just a functional one.
It is quite ornate and shows the Manchester coat-of-arms (now painted grey).
The bridge reflects Manchester's desire to display its civic pride and wealth.
Date: May 5th 2020
Start: SD543644, Brookhouse  (Map: OL41)
Route: N – Waterworks Bridge – S – old railway line – W – near Ellers Farm – S by
Artle Beck – E, S, SW – Forge Mill – E – Littledale Road – S – Brookhouse
Distance: 5 miles;   Ascent: 80 metres
© John Self, Drakkar Press, 2018-
Top photo: The western Howgills from Dillicar;
Bottom photo: Blencathra from Great Mell Fell